HOME BENEFITS INSURANCE LEGAL CORE BELIEFS NEWSLETTERS CONTACT JOIN/RENEW
REASONS TO JOIN
MEET NWPE LEADERS
UNIONISM:  YOUR RIGHTS
SCHOLARSHIPS & GRANTS
  TEACHER TESTIMONIALS
NEWS, VIEWS & ISSUES
PROFESSIONAL RESOURCES
OPEN LETTER TO TEACHERS
REFUTING UNION CLAIMS

 

 


 

NWPE News Notes
The Online Communiqué of Northwest Professional Educators
                                   
April 13, 2004

New Flexibility for 95% Test Participation - Policy Change

Tracey Bailey, National Projects Director for the Association of American Educators, has informed NWPE that the US Department of Education will now
allow some new flexibility when calculating the 95% Testing Participation Rate required of all schools in their determination of AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress): 
 
"The USDOE will now allow a common-sense multi-year 'averaging' of the participation rate to count for the 95% determination.  In other words, they are not really lowering or eliminating the 95% required in law, but they are allowing a two-year or three-year 'average' to count, instead of only a 'single-year snapshot.'  Also, legitimate medical absences which prevent a student from participating in the testing program will now NOT be counted against the school."
 
According to Bailey, the policy change is good news for teachers and great news for schools and principals, because it takes a little bit of pressure off of a school which formerly, because of the absence of just a few students on testing days, could be determined as "Needing Improvement".  It is not uncommon for only one or two students to put the entire school in a "Needs Improvement" status, simply by being below the 95%  testing participation rate.  This is especially true when dealing with some of the smaller subgroups of students.
 
Bailey remarks that to most people, this  seemto be a welcome, common-sense policy change that  will maintain a high standard for the testing participation rate, but which allow a school to avoid being penalized for a "one-year dip" or anomaly in the percentage of students being tested in small subgroups.
 
Please see the fact sheet and related links below for more information. 

United States Department of Education No Child Left Behind

NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND 

 March 29, 2004

EVERY CHILD DESERVES TO BE COUNTED

  No Child Left Behind requires all students to participate in a state's annual assessment, although a school can make "adequate yearly progress" (AYP) if at least 95 percent of students, measured by total school population and by subgroup, participate in the testing. This provision is one of the cornerstones of the No Child Left Behind reforms. It ensures that every child is counted so students who are struggling get the help they need. Full participation in assessments will make our schools more inclusive, responsive and fair.

  Under No Child Left Behind, states already have significant authority in calculating participation rates. States determine how large a subgroup must be in order to be considered separately for participation rate calculations. In addition, many states have testing windows, which include "make-up assessments" for students who miss tests. These make-up tests can count toward the school's participation rate.

  As part of the Department of Education's ongoing effort to develop No Child Left Behind policies that are right for students and fair for schools, the following are two new areas of flexibility to assist schools in meeting the 95% participation rate requirement: 

I. Average Participation Rate: In order to make "adequate yearly progress" (AYP), schools must demonstrate that at least 95 percent of all students participated in the assessment.  This requirement must be met for all students in a school and subgroups of those students (including ethnicity, poverty, disability, or English language proficiency, if the subgroup has a sufficient number of students).  

Under the new policy, a state may use data from the previous one or two years to average the participation rate data for a school and/or subgroup as needed.  If this two- or three-year average meets or exceeds 95 percent, the school will meet this AYP requirement.  Schools that are performing well in this category may not be unduly identified as "in need of improvement" because of a one- or two-year dip in their participation rates.  

For example, a school might find that its participation rate dropped to 94 percent for one year.  If in the previous two years, the rates were 95 percent and 96 percent then the school may average these three years to meet the 95 percent participation rate requirement.   

II. Medical Emergencies: There are rare circumstances when a student cannot take the assessment during the entire testing window, including make-up dates, due to a significant medical emergency.  For example, this might include a situation in which a student is recovering from a car accident. These students remain enrolled at the school, although such circumstances might prohibit them from participating in the test during the testing window.  

The new policy allows schools to omit such students when calculating their participation rates.  This will ensure that schools whose averages might be affected by such situations will not be unduly identified for improvement.  

***********************************

For Related Links and More Information, see below:

Secretary Paige Issues New Policy for Calculating Participation Rates Under No Child Left Behind  http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2004/03/03292004.html

Remarks by Secretary Paige before the
National School Boards Association

Orlando, Florida
http://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/2004/03/03292004.html

Remarks by First Lady Laura Bush at the National School Boards Association
Orlando, Florida
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2004/03/20040329-8.html

NWPE News Notes
The Online Communiqué of Northwest Professional Educators
                                   
April 13, 2004
 
NCLB UPDATE:    Flexibility for Demonstrating Highly Qualified Teacher
                        The Arts and NCLB
             
Flexibility for Highly Qualified Teachers
 
Secretary Paige has announced three new policies to give certain teachers greater flexibility in demonstrating that they are "highly qualified" under the No Child Left Behind Act. According to the US Department of Education:
  • Teachers in rural school districts who are "highly qualified" in at least one subject will have three years to become "highly qualified" in the additional subjects they teach.  They must also be provided professional development, intense supervision, or structured mentoring to become competent in those other areas. 

    Approximately 5,000, or one-third of all school districts in the U.S., are considered rural, and, frequently, teachers in these areas are required to teach more than one subject.  Existing teachers will have until the end of the 2006-07 school year; new teachers will have three years from their hiring date.
  • Based on their current certification requirements, states may permit science teachers to demonstrate that they are "highly qualified" either in "broad field" science or individual fields of science (biology, chemistry, physics). 
  • States may streamline their High, Objective, Uniform State Standard of Evaluation (HOUSSE) by developing a single process for current, multi-subject teachers to demonstrate that they are "highly qualified" in each of their subjects.  HOUSSE recognizes, among other things, experience, expertise, and professional training garnered over time.  
FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE GO TO http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2004/03/03152004.html
 
In Washington, please see http://www.k12.wa.us/ESEA/TitleII/TQ%20memorandum%2081-03.doc for clarification on NCLB teacher qualifications requirements ("Highly Qualified") and Washington's definition of "High Objective Uniform State Standard of Evaluation" (HOUSSE) which is required in NCLB.
 

The Arts and NCLB

A new publication by the Arts Education Partnership, titled "No Subject Left Behind," serves as a guide for arts education leaders seeking to learn more about No Child Left Behind and the multiple opportunities for arts education.  It offers an overview of the legislation, with specific references to the arts; a description of individual programs, with arts-specific examples that have received funding; and links to web sites for additional facts. 

FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE GO TO http://www.aep-arts.org/PDF%20Files/NoSubjectLeftBehind.pdf.


 


Copyright © 2007 Northwest Professional Educators Phone: 1-800-380-6973 Contact Us
Teacher Liability Insurance, Teacher Legal Protection, Teacher Scholarships & Classroom Mini-Grants, Professional Development,
A Voice on Education Issues & More!  Student Teacher Liability Insurance & Membership Also Available!